docs: CLAUDE.md 작업 프로토콜 추가 및 수정 계획 작성
- CLAUDE.md: Claude-Gemini 교차 토론 프로토콜 추가 - CLAUDE.md: 존재하지 않는 디렉토리 3개 제거 - analysis/fix-plan: 4 Phase 수정 계획 (Claude-Gemini 합의) - .claude/agents/: dev 리뷰 에이전트 9개 복사 - .claude/skills/: 프로젝트 스킬 4개 복사
This commit is contained in:
68
.claude/skills/project-health-score.md
Normal file
68
.claude/skills/project-health-score.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
|
||||
# Project Health Score Skill
|
||||
|
||||
## Trigger
|
||||
`/project-health [absolute_path]` or "프로젝트 건강 점수", "헬스 스코어"
|
||||
|
||||
## Description
|
||||
Calculates a weighted health score (0-100) across all 8 dimensions from the project audit.
|
||||
|
||||
## Scoring Weights
|
||||
|
||||
| Dimension | Weight | Rationale |
|
||||
|-----------|--------|-----------|
|
||||
| Security | 20% | Vulnerabilities can kill a product |
|
||||
| Architecture | 15% | Foundation determines long-term viability |
|
||||
| Code Quality | 15% | Maintainability = team velocity |
|
||||
| Testing | 15% | Safety net for changes |
|
||||
| Supply Chain | 10% | Legal and security exposure |
|
||||
| DevOps | 10% | Deployment reliability |
|
||||
| Performance | 10% | User experience |
|
||||
| Documentation | 5% | Onboarding and maintenance |
|
||||
|
||||
## Score Interpretation
|
||||
|
||||
| Range | Grade | Meaning |
|
||||
|-------|-------|---------|
|
||||
| 90-100 | A | Production-ready, well-maintained |
|
||||
| 75-89 | B | Good, minor issues to address |
|
||||
| 60-74 | C | Acceptable, significant improvements needed |
|
||||
| 40-59 | D | Risky, major issues present |
|
||||
| 0-39 | F | Critical, not safe for production |
|
||||
|
||||
## Output Format
|
||||
Final deliverable in **Korean (한국어)**.
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
# [Project Name] Health Score
|
||||
|
||||
## Overall: [Score]/100 — Grade [A/B/C/D/F]
|
||||
|
||||
## Radar Chart Data
|
||||
| Dimension | Score | Weight | Weighted |
|
||||
|-----------|-------|--------|----------|
|
||||
| Security | /10 | 20% | |
|
||||
| Architecture | /10 | 15% | |
|
||||
| Code Quality | /10 | 15% | |
|
||||
| Testing | /10 | 15% | |
|
||||
| Supply Chain | /10 | 10% | |
|
||||
| DevOps | /10 | 10% | |
|
||||
| Performance | /10 | 10% | |
|
||||
| Documentation | /10 | 5% | |
|
||||
| **Total** | | **100%** | **/100** |
|
||||
|
||||
## Trend (if previous audit exists)
|
||||
| Dimension | Previous | Current | Delta |
|
||||
|-----------|----------|---------|-------|
|
||||
|
||||
## Bottom 3 (Biggest Improvement Opportunities)
|
||||
1. [Dimension] — [Score] — [Quick Win]
|
||||
2. ...
|
||||
3. ...
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Brutal Analysis Principles
|
||||
- Weighted score must be mathematically correct — no rounding in favor
|
||||
- Grade F projects must be called out explicitly
|
||||
|
||||
## Claude-Gemini Cross-Debate Protocol
|
||||
Score disagreements > 1 point per dimension are debated until consensus.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user