docs: CLAUDE.md 작업 프로토콜 추가 및 수정 계획 작성

- CLAUDE.md: Claude-Gemini 교차 토론 프로토콜 추가
- CLAUDE.md: 존재하지 않는 디렉토리 3개 제거
- analysis/fix-plan: 4 Phase 수정 계획 (Claude-Gemini 합의)
- .claude/agents/: dev 리뷰 에이전트 9개 복사
- .claude/skills/: 프로젝트 스킬 4개 복사
This commit is contained in:
JiWoong Sul
2026-03-27 16:52:52 +09:00
parent 6f5b3ba8f4
commit 916a50992c
17 changed files with 1672 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
# Project Health Score Skill
## Trigger
`/project-health [absolute_path]` or "프로젝트 건강 점수", "헬스 스코어"
## Description
Calculates a weighted health score (0-100) across all 8 dimensions from the project audit.
## Scoring Weights
| Dimension | Weight | Rationale |
|-----------|--------|-----------|
| Security | 20% | Vulnerabilities can kill a product |
| Architecture | 15% | Foundation determines long-term viability |
| Code Quality | 15% | Maintainability = team velocity |
| Testing | 15% | Safety net for changes |
| Supply Chain | 10% | Legal and security exposure |
| DevOps | 10% | Deployment reliability |
| Performance | 10% | User experience |
| Documentation | 5% | Onboarding and maintenance |
## Score Interpretation
| Range | Grade | Meaning |
|-------|-------|---------|
| 90-100 | A | Production-ready, well-maintained |
| 75-89 | B | Good, minor issues to address |
| 60-74 | C | Acceptable, significant improvements needed |
| 40-59 | D | Risky, major issues present |
| 0-39 | F | Critical, not safe for production |
## Output Format
Final deliverable in **Korean (한국어)**.
```markdown
# [Project Name] Health Score
## Overall: [Score]/100 — Grade [A/B/C/D/F]
## Radar Chart Data
| Dimension | Score | Weight | Weighted |
|-----------|-------|--------|----------|
| Security | /10 | 20% | |
| Architecture | /10 | 15% | |
| Code Quality | /10 | 15% | |
| Testing | /10 | 15% | |
| Supply Chain | /10 | 10% | |
| DevOps | /10 | 10% | |
| Performance | /10 | 10% | |
| Documentation | /10 | 5% | |
| **Total** | | **100%** | **/100** |
## Trend (if previous audit exists)
| Dimension | Previous | Current | Delta |
|-----------|----------|---------|-------|
## Bottom 3 (Biggest Improvement Opportunities)
1. [Dimension] — [Score] — [Quick Win]
2. ...
3. ...
```
## Brutal Analysis Principles
- Weighted score must be mathematically correct — no rounding in favor
- Grade F projects must be called out explicitly
## Claude-Gemini Cross-Debate Protocol
Score disagreements > 1 point per dimension are debated until consensus.