# Project Health Score Skill ## Trigger `/project-health [absolute_path]` or "프로젝트 건강 점수", "헬스 스코어" ## Description Calculates a weighted health score (0-100) across all 8 dimensions from the project audit. ## Scoring Weights | Dimension | Weight | Rationale | |-----------|--------|-----------| | Security | 20% | Vulnerabilities can kill a product | | Architecture | 15% | Foundation determines long-term viability | | Code Quality | 15% | Maintainability = team velocity | | Testing | 15% | Safety net for changes | | Supply Chain | 10% | Legal and security exposure | | DevOps | 10% | Deployment reliability | | Performance | 10% | User experience | | Documentation | 5% | Onboarding and maintenance | ## Score Interpretation | Range | Grade | Meaning | |-------|-------|---------| | 90-100 | A | Production-ready, well-maintained | | 75-89 | B | Good, minor issues to address | | 60-74 | C | Acceptable, significant improvements needed | | 40-59 | D | Risky, major issues present | | 0-39 | F | Critical, not safe for production | ## Output Format Final deliverable in **Korean (한국어)**. ```markdown # [Project Name] Health Score ## Overall: [Score]/100 — Grade [A/B/C/D/F] ## Radar Chart Data | Dimension | Score | Weight | Weighted | |-----------|-------|--------|----------| | Security | /10 | 20% | | | Architecture | /10 | 15% | | | Code Quality | /10 | 15% | | | Testing | /10 | 15% | | | Supply Chain | /10 | 10% | | | DevOps | /10 | 10% | | | Performance | /10 | 10% | | | Documentation | /10 | 5% | | | **Total** | | **100%** | **/100** | ## Trend (if previous audit exists) | Dimension | Previous | Current | Delta | |-----------|----------|---------|-------| ## Bottom 3 (Biggest Improvement Opportunities) 1. [Dimension] — [Score] — [Quick Win] 2. ... 3. ... ``` ## Brutal Analysis Principles - Weighted score must be mathematically correct — no rounding in favor - Grade F projects must be called out explicitly ## Claude-Gemini Cross-Debate Protocol Score disagreements > 1 point per dimension are debated until consensus.